Preaching from the Adi Granth (aka Sikhism 101).

Okay, so at UW it's actually called RS 202, but was essentially an introductory course to Sikhism (and in my case, all things India).
I knew very little about Punjabi culture before taking this course, but as one of four non-Sikhs (or those with Sikh ties) in the class, I learned TONS. I definitely have more thoughts on the course than what I'm going to write about here, but in general there were a few "macro-level" concepts that stuck with me after the exam.
A few things everyone should know about Sikhism before we go any further:
1) It is monotheistic. There is one, universal God in Sikh doctrine.
2) It emerged about 600 years ago out of the Punjab region of India.
3) It has a guruship. Guru Nanak was the first (founder). There were 9 others. The Sikh scriptures are now considered the guru (this is an overly simplistic explanation according to the prof, but it works for here).
4) Karma exists in a Sikh worldview. Liberation from a cyclical system of rebirth is a goal.
5) Punjabi food is great.

Sikhism makes a lot of really cool points. If you read Sikh scripture (the Adi Granth), you'll find a TON of passages that sound like they're taken straight out of the Psalms. Or Genesis for that matter. Check this one out:

"The self-existent God became manifested in Nam [the Name]. Second came the creation of the universe. God pervades and revels in the creation." (AG 463)

My first reaction was HOLY MOLEY. The Sikh scriptures just took Genesis 1 and gave me the Colesnotes version.

It's funny; people may write off the philosophies and theologies of others simply because its either not their own religion, or more often, its not in their own religious language. I learned a lot by taking this course. Not only about Sikhism as a religion, a history, and a culture, but about how in the end many of the tenets and doctrines of the world's religions are simply universal observations about humanity's pursuit of God. And more importantly, His pursuit of humanity. If God has revealed Himself in all of creation (and I don't just mean birds, mountains and the rest of the stuff people Instagram and hashtag "Creation", I mean the Universe and all its laws, workings, and the ways of its inhabitants)--then He's perfectly able to reveal His truth within the framework of other religions.

Oh no! She's a universalist!
Sheeesh.
No.

Though perhaps not the whole picture, or the right direction, other belief systems are marked by our shared desire to explain the unmistakable presence of "more" in the universe. Of goodness. Of preeminence. Of the glorious truth of a loving God. From what I gather, we don't observe similarities in religions because of the existence of some shared neurosis but because there is one true God that pervades and revels in the creation He has made.

And in Christ, He's called us to His side; freely, by grace. And unfortunately, we (regardless of religious conviction) always seem to complicate the free grace and unending love of God. We make systems of His love. Don't mind me, but I'm-a-gonna preach now. The thing I love about the Christian worldview, and why I call myself a follower of Christ, is the wonderful notion that only in Christianity is free grace found. And found abundantly. No systems, no karma, just love. I regret everyday that I sit in pride, thinking that there must be something more because, well, I don't understand it all or why it's that simple (because obviously if God was really God, my 25lb brain would be able to fathom Him and all His ways). Well, that's the beauty of it. It is that simple, and no, I'm not supposed to understand it all.  The observations of God's prevalence throughout the universe convinces me that He wants us to get this. To show us that no matter how we try to explain it away or systematize it, He's not only the Lord of everything, but that He's made a way for us to know Him more than we could on our own. I've heard a lot of pretty convincing ways of explaining God throughout my degree, but none such words stick quite as much as when Jesus said, unashamedly, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one come to the Father except through me."

The preface?

"For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son so that all who believe in Him would not perish, but have everlasting life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him."

I'll never understand exactly how or why. Isn't that strange? I'll soon graduate with a degree in Religious Studies and I don't have God figured out? Heaven forbid. 

The Unknown God

I’m taking five courses in my 4A term at UW, one of which is a required course for all RS majors: RS 260, also known as The Study of Religion. The entire course is about HOW we are to study religion (as an aside, I’m one of those who would argue that Christianity is not just another "religion" as the term has come to mean, and thus the course name unsettles me from the get-go—but I’ve found there’s no sense in arguing it—if I’m going to study Christianity at a secular school, I’m going to need to get over it).

The first chapter of the textbook for the course outlines E.B. Tylor’s theory of religion. It’s an anthropological take on things and tries to explain how we as humans have not only evolved physically, but spiritually. Tylor states that we began by noticing that we seemed to have “another self”, seen in dreams. This then progressed to the assumption that we have a soul. Then animism comes into play where according to Tyler we ascribed these “unseen spirits” to plants, animals, and abiotic factors as well. Five assumptions later (and I do mean assumptions—it reads: “And then we must have...”) and we’ve made our way to monotheism.

Okay, so I’m going to be honest, I’m not convinced. But I’m also not here to just slam my textbook, the class and all it presents. Same with evolution. I’ve been led to the point of stating simply that God is sovereign and created how He created, and I don’t think we’ll know the intricacies of that work until we stand before Him. Ultimately, what He actually did is the truth. Will we know exactly what He did? No amount of scientific speculation, nor printed historical record could ever give us the full picture of His majesty as Creator anyway. I guess you could say that I sit comfortably on a rather wide fence.

Tangent alert! Back to Tyler’s theory.

Do I think it’s bogus? Yup.

Do I think his observations are invalid? Not in the slightest.

To give a little context, Tyler researched the religious practises of primitive peoples (I use the term loosely) and published a few books in his career. On the whole, this animism theory was apparently big stuff back when anthropology wasn’t a defined discipline.

Although his theory served as disproof of God for many, I can’t help but be all the more convinced of my Maker’s greatness. And frankly, this happens in most of my classes whether they’re talking about atheism, Krishna, Buddha, or the Lord Himself. Our amazing Creator has left His mark on all of humanity and over history we’ve taken note. There is clearly a deep desire in all humans to seek after God. Hypothetically, if Tylor is right and primitive peoples did made all those assumptions then all we have is an amazing God who reveals Himself to all people and has been guiding our discovery of who He is all along. We’ve all noticed Him. We all have the instinct to seek after more for a reason.

So really, all these attempts to explain away God because we can see a process of revelation is absurd to me. The process we see we've assumed is one of our own volition. What if it’s been God revealing Himself? After all, if we don't praise Him rocks would still cry out. If He is who He claims to be (ahem, God Almighty) then shouldn't His presence be pervasive throughout all the world, all basic human longing, the desire for Whom started waves of searching for answers? What I mean is that we as humans have clearly always been looking for Him. In all sorts of places.

Here’s my point (I think). I believe that Jesus is who He claims to be: The Way, the Truth, and the Life, and that all other answers to our fundamental questions for meaning (religions) are null and void by way of that proclamation. 

God shows Himself to be true by an imprint on every human heart. Regardless of how we try to explain it. Before there’s a stamp on a baptismal certificate or a signature below a doctrinal statement, our great God has laid eternity in the human heart, and none can fathom what He has done from beginning to end. Our observation of such doesn’t mean He’s not there. He's behind everything that we’re seeing. 

These are the waters I get to navigate. Endless explanations and no answers. Thankfully, God has proven that it’s always better to take my study to Him and lay what I’ve been told at His feet. After all, He is the ultimate authority on Himself.

Scriptures for thought

^“While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was greatly distressed to see that the city was full of idols. So he reasoned in the synagogue with both Jews and God-fearing Greeks, as well as in the marketplace day by day with those who happened to be there.  A group of Epicurean and Stoic philosophers began to debate with him. Some of them asked, “What is this babbler trying to say?” Others remarked, “He seems to be advocating foreign gods.” They said this because Paul was preaching the good news about Jesus and the resurrection. Then they took him and brought him to a meeting of the Areopagus, where they said to him, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are presenting? You are bringing some strange ideas to our ears, and we would like to know what they mean.” (All the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there spent their time doing nothing but talking about and listening to the latest ideas.) Paul then stood up in the meeting of the Areopagus and said: “People of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious. For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: to an unknown god. So you are ignorant of the very thing you worship—and this is what I am going to proclaim to you. “The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by human hands. And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything. Rather, he himself gives everyone life and breath and everything else. From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us. ‘For in him we live and move and have our being.’ As some of your own poets have said, ‘We are his offspring.’
“Therefore since we are God’s offspring, we should not think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone—an image made by human design and skill. In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. ³¹ For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising him from the dead.”  When they heard about the resurrection of the dead, some of them sneered, but others said, “We want to hear you again on this subject.” At that, Paul left the Council.  Some of the people became followers of Paul and believed. Among them was Dionysius, a member of the Areopagus, also a woman named Damaris, and a number of others.

“He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the human heart; yet no one can fathom what God has done from beginning to end.”

Ecclesiastes 3:11

My paper turned into a blog. At least I don't have to cite.

Like I said: I'm in the middle of writing a paper and got tired of having to cite, and give proof, and argue my opinion in a way that makes me sound smarter (or is it more arrogant?) than I actually am. Thus I decided to head for the ol' bloggo instead. Where anything goes. Almost. Okay, at least you just have to take my word for it, no footnotes, no Chicago, no nothing. It's a nice break!

The paper I've been plugging away at (in the same cafe for 6 hours) asks whether or not it is okay for Christians to be police officers. I've come to a some riveting conclusions:

Yes.

No.

and Sometimes.


Yowza.Thankfully I was blessed by finding a great book that has helped me articulate this in a way that makes enough sense!

The big thing that I've noticed while writing this dang thing is that it really, REALLY doesn't matter what the best scholars say about how Christians should make decisions in their walk. It's nice to have centuries of insight available, and I like Bonhoeffer as much as the next person, but when it comes to praxis none of it matters.
My main argument in the paper focuses on policing in light of the Gospel: It seeks restoration, peace, and is rooted in fostering community before patrolling it. True and just policing is very grassroots in my opinion, and is all about being an agent of social change. Therefore, yes, a Christian can definitely be a police officer.
But what about the violence? (say the pacifists)
Well, it's unavoidable. Like any sin, there's nothing we can do about it. It exists in the world, and though we are conquerors in Christ--it's still there. Crime prevention programs work, but only go so far, and one day the Christian police officer might need to employ violence to intervene. Does that mean Christians shouldn't be police officers? No. Maybe?
Sometimes...a believer's personal conviction before the Lord says "No", and that's okay too (can I get an Amen from the Anabaptists!). Romans 14 goes over all that, and it makes sense. If the Lord says no, don't do it. And if you do it anyway, it's sin. But, maybe just watch out about assuming that He's going to say that for everyone. Each believer has their own relationship with the Lord, and needs to be faithful to what He's shown them, first and foremost.
Personally, I sit comfortably on the fence on a lot of issues--including this policing thing, just war versus pacifism, Calvinism versus everybody else, etc.
Why? Because ultimately, it is the Lord who decides and the Lord who teaches. I'm always challenged by people who hold vastly different convictions than my own. But frankly, it's all too easy to take that challenge as an attack. Let's just put it out there: Christians come in all sorts. We're allowed to have different opinions and convictions! As much as it causes divisions (over 600 official ones...) I believe that our differences in opinion simply speak to a complex, unexplainable God who is truly beyond our conception.
Hug a pacifist today, and commend a Christian police officer  :) They're both holding on to difficult convictions to live out; and in essence, both are right.



And speaking of Bonhoeffer...I've decided to spend the month of December trying to understand Christmas. This book will be one of my tools! I want to understand why it is we celebrate the way we do, and how in the world we so easily lose sight of the reality of what it meant for God to become man and dwell among us.  I'll probably do some blogging on it, so stay tuned! Despite what this picture says, you can't click to look inside...sorry to disappoint. Follow the link I posted below instead :)

http://www.amazon.com/God-Is-Manger-Reflections-Christmas/dp/0664238874


PS, Happy first day of Advent!

 

Bold as Love

WE'RE MARRIED! HOORAY! The whole thing went off without a hitch and now Josh and I are in the process of tackling work, school, and adjusting to this HUGE change in our lives. We've been learning a lot, and if someone asks us, "How is married life?" they usually get that as an answer! Seriously, it's the most wonderful, challenging, frustrating, self-exposing, joyful thing God has ever led me into. Naturally, this comes along with a few thoughts on the matter and there is one in particular I think is worth sharing today :) So here goes.

Getting married is a partnership. Two people, coming together  and becoming one is the single most complete partnership imaginable. Now, as far as I know, this comes along with a few presuppositions. For example, that both people love each other—of course not making reference to infatuation because that’s an altogether different concept. Instead, the love they share, I've heard, is an I-Got-Your-Back Love. There's nothing else like it. An unfailing love. An altogether, completely committed love. A deep, a wide, a long, a high love. Like the love of Christ, because of Christ, through Christ.

Okay, we've established a working definition of true love. Good.

Now, what else makes up a marriage partnership? At least, what have I recently discovered about it?

It takes individualism.

Now, don’t get me wrong here, I’m not talking about the definition of individualism that the world perpetuates; not an aspiration towards a go-it-alone life, dependent on oneself, strongheaded and proud. Nope, not that. I’m talking about individualism of, well... the individual themselves--lonesomeness in the sense that I think God meant when Christ left His disciples to be by Himself with the Father.

What I mean is if one truly wants to experience the deepest joys and purposes of a God-given partnership, one must go up on the mountain—alone—to seek His face. This doesn’t mean abandoning the partnership, but taking time out within it to be intentionally lonesome. And only in that aloneness with God can we even be able to know the other person in the deepest, truest sense. If it is the same God working in both of our hearts, who made us, who is shaping us into the people He intends for us to be, then we only get to know that person better by delving deeper into the vastness of who God is.  

Check out 3:15-6:00 for my earlier reference. John rants on about his struggles with love in the middle of a phenomenal cover of Jimi Hendix's Bold as Love. Enjoy :) 

Bold as Love-John Mayer

A bit of an intro.

 I put off writing a blog for a really long time. I sort of flirted with the idea for about a year or so; word processing my thoughts and saving them for when I finally got around to it. After running out of reasons to put this off, without further ado, here it goes! These are the thoughts, rants, ideas, and free-form prose (maybe) that often come to mind and that I seek to share with whoever is willing to read them.

I guess the way to start this would be to give you a little background about who exactly is behind this. My name is Katie Martin (Kerrison), I am primarily a Christian, secondly a student of Christianity in pursuit of a degree from the University of Waterloo. I am originally from Mississauga, Ontario and grew up in what I can only describe as an amazing, loving, non-Christian, religious-ish, home with parents and a brother whom I love dearly. We almost never agree on matters of faith but that has never affected us more than my fundamental desire for them to know Jesus—to really know Jesus—and to experience the love and truth found only in Him. Even if we disagree, they’re still the best, hands down.

 I also have this great husband named Josh. We met at UW last year and got married on September 2^nd of this year.

He works two jobs : a restaurant line cook/dishwasher/sometimes the only cook there because they didn’t hire a new one for a long time, and as a support worker with adults with developmental disabilities. He makes me proud (the good kind) every day, and takes on the role of best friend better than I could have ever imagined. 

Apart from studying, I do in fact work. I teach horseback riding lessons and do secretarial things for a lesson barn/trail riding facility in Waterloo—probably one of the most flexible, lowest paying jobs I’ve worked since high school but every time I quit I find my way back. There’s reasons for that, I just often ignore them because I get fed up with standing in the cold, smelling like poop, and yelling at children to sit up taller or else they’re going to hit the dirt. It’s really quite a good job.

Last summer I took a position as an assistant camp director for a church in Hamilton and was living there with a wonderful couple who allowed me to camp out in their home and eat their food for two months. For free. Just saying, but God’s provision is never what we expect but is always entirely what we need. Just wanted to mention that.

Camp itself has always been a huge part of my life. I came to know Jesus at camp, I came back to know Jesus at camp, and I’ve been working out what it means to love Jesus and follow Him—through camp. I firmly believe that God uses summer camp ministries to show His infinite love to children and youth in out of the ordinary ways. Camp takes kids out of their day to day context and exposes them to and intense dose of Kingdom community in the span of a week. On our end of things (in camp ministry) that means we have to be following Christ ourselves and actually be living out the Kingdom of God in camp ministry. But that’s another whole post in and of itself, me thinks. I’ll get to that later.

So all in all, I really feel that God has been pushing me to start keeping this blog. It’s not at all about sharing what’s going on in my life, but about what He’s doing in it. If Christ is my life, than I consequently have none without Him. So when I write and reflect on this life I’m living—it’s hopefully gonna be all about Him.